Bug#643981: ITP: felix-osgi-core -- Java OSGi interfaces - Core module
Damien,
I have already package OSGi minimum, foundation and compendium.
You can find them here:
https://launchpad.net/%7Eludovicc/+archive/ppa/+index?batch=75&memo=75&start=75
https://code.launchpad.net/~ludovicc/uj/osgi-ee-foundation-api
https://code.launchpad.net/~ludovicc/uj/osgi-ee-minimum-api
https://code.launchpad.net/~ludovicc/uj/osgi-core
https://code.launchpad.net/~ludovicc/uj/osgi-compendium
We simply need to upload those packages to Debian.
Ludovic
On 01/10/2011 14:21, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" <drazzib@debian.org>
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name : felix-osgi-core
> Version : 1.4.0
> Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation / OSGi Alliance
> * URL : http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-osgi-core.html
> * License : Apache-2.0
> Programming Lang: Java
> Description : Java OSGi interfaces - Core module
>
> OSGi, for Open Services Gateway initiative framework, is a module system and
> service platform for the Java programming language.
> .
> This package contains OSGi Core for Release 4 Version 4.2.
> Two main provided packages are org.osgi.service and
> org.osgi.framework.
> .
> The Apache Felix OSGi Core sub-project simply repackages the
> standard OSGi Core API packages provided by the OSGi Alliance
> into a Maven module. There is no runtime dependencies between this package
> and Felix Framework itself, so that this library can be used without Felix.
>
>
> Right now, Felix Framework packages in Debian depends on libequinox-osgi-java
> (Eclipse Equinox OSGi framework) in order to just have OSGi simple interfaces.
> Since we have netbeans depending on felix-framework, then Netbeans source
> package actually depends on Eclipse... [1]
>
> By providing those felix-osgi-* packages, my goal is to have a separate,
> simplier, dependency chains for Netbeans.
>
> [1] http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=netbeans
>
> Chers,
Reply to: