Bug#640786: replacing Perspectives extension with Convergence?
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:41:52AM +0200, email@example.com wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 02:42:48PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > it appears someone has already filed an ITP for convergence: #640786
> > i've got a git branch too, but haven't pushed it anywhere just yet (what am i
> > waiting for?).
pushed my branch here:
i made a single source package of both the extension and the notary server,
since upstream is maintaining them in a single git tree. although really it
seems like it might make more sense to maintain them as two separate source
> I've refrained myself to send this ITP for days, thinking someone would
> probably do it at some point. But so far no one did so I finally decided
> to send it. It's nice to see that this bug attract people that have been
> working on the packaging.
> If we are several people interested to work on this, maybe we can setup a
> team and a git on alioth, or maybe join the pkg-mozext-maintainers team
> and use their infrastructure. What do you think?
definitely should have some sort of team infrastructure, although the notary
server code might be outside of what the pkg-mozext-maintainers team normally
handles. not sure what would be best.
i should also mention that upstream is not so sure we should package for debian
until development slows a bit, expecting multiple new versions a week. if we
did upload to debian, experimental might be most appropriate. that said, it
seems like perspectives shouldn't necessarily be removed the moment convergence
hits debian; it's a little more field tested.
p.s. i've subscribed to the bug report myself, so no need to CC me if you're
CCing the bug report. i left most folks out of the CC list; hope that's ok.