Bug#641207: marked as done (ITP: ordereddict -- drop-in substitute for collections found in Python 2.7)
Your message dated Sun, 11 Sep 2011 18:35:41 +0200
with message-id <4E6CE35D.50202@fladi.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#641207: ITP: ordereddict -- drop-in substitute for collections found in Python 2.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #641207,
regarding ITP: ordereddict -- drop-in substitute for collections found in Python 2.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
641207: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=641207
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: FladischerMichael@fladi.at
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
* Package name : ordereddict
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com>
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ordereddict/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Description : drop-in substitute for collections found in Python 2.7
Drop-in substitute for Py2.7's new collections.OrderedDict. It has big-oh
performance that matches regular dictionaries (amortized O(1)
insertion/deletion/lookup and O(n) iteration/repr/copy/equality_testing).
..
Ordered dictionaries are just like regular dictionaries but they remember the
order that items were inserted. When iterating over an ordered dictionary, the
items are returned in the order their keys were first added.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAk5s1D8ACgkQeJ3z1zFMUGYF2wCfRM2oq8PUYuZKL6/ZrCx+Buws
KWoAnjIW2Nz79cSx/VbSzfs9y2eQOWzK
=ut+J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 09/11/2011 06:10 PM, James Vega wrote:
> There was already an ITP for this (#637849) and it was cancelled due
> to the planned removal of Python 2.6.
Thanks, I must have missed this ITP. Therefor closing this one too.
Cheers,
--
Michael Fladischer
--- End Message ---
Reply to: