[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#622163: marked as done (ITA: gphotofs -- filesystem to mount digital cameras)

Your message dated Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:02:09 +0000
with message-id <E1QiqGn-0004rh-Bw@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#622163: fixed in gphotofs 0.4.0-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #622163,
regarding ITA: gphotofs -- filesystem to mount digital cameras
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

622163: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=622163
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I request an adopter for the gphotofs package.

You can get the full subversion history and data with:
svn co --username guest --password guest -r 2649 https://svn.linux-dev.org/svn/pkg/ pkg

The package description is:
 GPhotoFS is a filesystem client based on libgphoto2 that exposes
 supported cameras as filesystems; while some cameras implement the USB
 Mass Storage class and already appear as filesystems (making this
 program redundant), many use the Picture Transfer Protocol (PTP) or
 some other custom protocol. But as long as the camera is supported
 by libgphoto2, it can be mounted as a filesystem using this program.
 This package is based on the FUSE (filesystem in user space)
 infra-structure of the Linux kernel and, therefore, does not require
 any modifications to the kernel, apart from the fuse module.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gphotofs
Source-Version: 0.4.0-6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gphotofs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to main/g/gphotofs/gphotofs_0.4.0-6.debian.tar.gz
  to main/g/gphotofs/gphotofs_0.4.0-6.dsc
  to main/g/gphotofs/gphotofs_0.4.0-6_amd64.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 622163@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
David Bremner <bremner@debian.org> (supplier of updated gphotofs package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 11:47:19 -0300
Source: gphotofs
Binary: gphotofs
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.4.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian PhotoTools Maintainers <pkg-phototools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
 gphotofs   - filesystem to mount digital cameras
Closes: 622163
 gphotofs (0.4.0-6) unstable; urgency=low
   * Adopt package (Closes: #622163)
   * Depend on fuse4bsd on Debian/kbsd systems
 89c55703cdf64f139b22214613b3d6deab6f9aee 1417 gphotofs_0.4.0-6.dsc
 9e4572feb9e0cf5ff0d3d78ddb252bf3ec99633f 5485 gphotofs_0.4.0-6.debian.tar.gz
 dc18f277315df219825a2a47df65e48e37089087 17832 gphotofs_0.4.0-6_amd64.deb
 972d0369121a536423d61c4e84fae5614c8c1a6fdbc806f7cfc0ea29d00e99e8 1417 gphotofs_0.4.0-6.dsc
 5c0e46fa3cdf2454adfa3ca588f4b4cefc4e19f02ae44f1f876710ccabe2879e 5485 gphotofs_0.4.0-6.debian.tar.gz
 714ba6818624680052b38a74f1ded692ce68c534d5014e7946ca07c4615a1722 17832 gphotofs_0.4.0-6_amd64.deb
 322c3e002d22a9ed6bc7b10885212b6d 1417 utils optional gphotofs_0.4.0-6.dsc
 ab75abf3f994d94330aa2cd44c55de13 5485 utils optional gphotofs_0.4.0-6.debian.tar.gz
 b084705e5aadb0658219cc5d4001c312 17832 utils optional gphotofs_0.4.0-6_amd64.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)


--- End Message ---

Reply to: