On Sunday 22 May 2011 01:20 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le samedi 21 mai 2011 à 18:05 +0530, Bilal Akhtar a écrit : >> Package: wnpp >> Severity: wishlist >> Owner: Bilal Akhtar <bilalakhtar@ubuntu.com> >> >> >> * Package name : gnome-shell-extensions >> Version : 3.0.2 >> * URL : http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/Extensions >> * License : GPLv2 >> Programming Lang: JavaScript, CSS >> Description : Extensions to extend functionality of GNOME Shell > > I think it would make sense to put this package in the pkg-gnome > repository. Would that be OK with you? That's what I had planned. Forgot to mention it in the ITP, sorry for the confusion. Yes, I will place this under pkg-gnome. > >> This package contains a set of extensions which add functionality and/or >> add to the looks of the GNOME Shell desktop. > > The only problem with that package is that there is still no extension > manager, unfortunately. I guess it could be written as an extension > (like epiphany does). Yes, there sure is no extension manager, but the user can look up extensions in looking glass. We would like to remain close to upstream for this one, so its okay to ship extensions in different binary packages generated by the same source. The user can install the extensions which he/she likes. > > In the meantime we could probably agree upon a set of extensions enabled > by default (at the very least, we need alternative-status-menu) and let > users enable the others in dconf. > As I have mentioned already, one binary package for each extension should suffice for now. We can plan those later. Thoughts? -- Bilal Akhtar - Ubuntu Developer <bilalakhtar@ubuntu.com> IRC Nick: cdbs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature