[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#458812: ITP: aster -- Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software for engineering simulations



> Da: Pierre JUILLARD <pierre.juillard@gmail.com>
> Oggetto: Re: ITP: aster -- Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software for > engineering simulations
> A: "Adam C Powell IV" <hazelsct@debian.org>
> Cc: 458812@bugs.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org, "Nicolas > Chauvat" <nicolas.chauvat@logilab.fr>
> Data: Martedì 10 maggio 2011, 14:52

> Maybe the best thing to do:
> - trying to compile Code-Aster with metis-edf and seeing how many test cases fail
> - trying to compile Code-Aster with metis and seeing how many test cases fail
> 
> I wouldn't be surprised if there was no differences...

Hi,

I also have the feeling that nothing would change; moreover, I also think
that CA can be built (and work) with scotchmetis instead of metis.
At the moment I'm not completely sure wether linking against metis is
really required or not; I've also asked on the forum[1], but had no
answer.
So, when 10.4 will come out, I think I'll try in the first place
to build with scotchmetis, and if this will work - bith the compilation
and the validation tests - I'll also try to build without scotchmetis.
If metis/metis-edf is only called via an external program, we could
upload code-aster in the main section, upload metis-edf on non-free and
make it a recommended/suggested dependance... right?

Bye
Andrea




Reply to: