[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#473213: Grails' roadmap to sid



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2011-03-27 00:28, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> block 473213 by 453471
> thanks
> 
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:02:32PM -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>> So, in the next weeks (months??) I'm going to prepare a package
>> for grails 1.3.x. Before that can be completed, a package for
>> gradle must reach unstable. I'm working on it right now.
> 
> Quick update:
> 
> Later I found out that Grails 1.3.x is uncompatible with
> Hibernate >= 3.5. It builds just fine but is not usable.
> So, now I'm waiting for Grails 1.4. BTW, on this week upstream
> added support for Hibernate 3.6 but I don't know yet when Grails
> 1.4 could be released (maybe by the end of this year?).
> 
> Gradle and Spring 3.0 already reached unstable, so the missing
> pieces to have Grails in Debian are:
> 
> * Upload libradeox-java (or the fork prepared by Grails team).
> * Upload libhibernate3-java 3.6.
> * Reimplement a few classes providing JSON features because they are
>   not DFSG-compliant (infamous clause of not doing evil with software...).
> 

Depending on the actual implementation we may want to (re-)use this for
libjabsorb-java to get it back into main.

> Maybe another missing dependencies in Debian could appear with 1.4
> release but after packaging Spring 3.0 and Gradle I guess that should
> not bring too much work compared with what is already
> done (famous last words?).
> 

~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=kJLh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: