[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#593011: ITP: icedove-compact-header -- extension to allow message headers to be abbreviated



2011/3/21 Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 09:19:32PM -0600, Williams Orellana wrote:
>> I intend to package the icedove-compact-header for Debian.
>
> I'm about to sponsor it. However, I wondered if it would be better
> to target unstable?

Done.

>
> There is some trailing whitespace in the long description. That's not
> a problem immediately, but if you want to target unstable it makes
> sense to fix that too.
>

fixed too.

> Otherwise, I'll upload the package as it is.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
> Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw
>
> 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNh8YCAAoJEFOUR53TUkxRQV0P/RLQDhhdp2D9/ZMpVfXokDOQ
> Q3RwxKGaO5TsimevK4uw0G7HoHJG+f321MneBXukwVHVAF6i/T7DD7fm11brioXb
> IXF2qbi0a3Z7mGHaAHBwFo9xfkGFI3z2tAONRdKzV8AiGpEk9qHVVEHpJvZ6Cdap
> ZWfrC5PeJYYoIQybJz+hzkeCF6JlDpersoBJtmzhQiAKpObwgDswuOqF3zpPnpiT
> 57t4qyowPGgRrSTxDTne+PIBYnnAynBEUYtlP3xZbrrQGeaH0K4e1DxLQsgZoyYp
> KCF+1V10ceqr0Ju5GbBqf2sth7rxpc4inlcyEu4nd7JirGEEwT3tLVUQYEWd/QwX
> y+Vg6oQ3+YsietHeaMFDT7HBhT+kf6V8vi49tioIk94rEJWzdkvdUtTxFchynbdj
> 6fnqGM45cPrsefM/QXAaCMVdGYYDF1cPVihUvYQDLf3wXGNiLILK6SnVy6kvvXMz
> /jw3f344wv8KXKcUX9iT1Z8vsUKC5yxBfVo4FAXDBRP/hnuGgs7pY71wap87tFmh
> UWnPYtnJ7S277EOnK93vkH3YIZk2vPETwePvhTB9+rDtDmvTObdPZYy9gvNI7yIa
> uZNHTAAomeVjrks0Kj26oqnjg8DnZUnWEuEd3ugyBzwgSjJ5jgVLoqFyx1ci4VWs
> QwXdqrmbJ/O80X7e3Km/
> =coxw
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>

Thanks for taking the time to review my package and sponsor

Best Regards!!

-- 
 .''`.     Williams Orellana
: :'  :    http://williamsorellana.org
`. `'`    4096R/0FCFE54C
  `-       EEA4 00D1 9C76 E84F D261 E04D A70A C4A1 0FCF E54C



Reply to: