Hi Michael, On 03/25/2011 10:19 AM, Michael Hanke wrote: > I see that your package is already in Debian under the name 'chipw'. The > cctools that I'm packaging have been around under this name for some 7-8 > years. What do you think about keeping the name 'chipw' for your source > package? cctools is not chipw; cctools and chipw are both level editors for the same game, but are different software. cctools was initially released in 2003 (see http://replay.waybackmachine.org/20031023153231/http://www.freewebs.com/cctools/news.htm), so it also has an 8-year history :) That aside, I didn't file a WNPP bug for cctools (that I could recall or find), and am not currently working on packaging for the same. I don't have a problem with you taking the source name "cctools", I could use something like "cctools-editor" for the source package name if needed. > Regarding the binary package names I don't have a strong opinion. Maybe > we can both use more verbose names to disambiguate the software better. Sure. -- Luke Faraone;; Debian & Ubuntu Developer; Sugar Labs, Systems lfaraone on irc.[freenode,oftc].net -- http://luke.faraone.cc PGP fprint: 5189 2A7D 16D0 49BB 046B DC77 9732 5DD8 F9FD D506
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature