Bug#587854: getdp-sparskit: changing back from ITP to RFP

[Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>]

On 21/02/11 at 10:29 +0100, trophime wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-19 at 17:08 +0000, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > retitle 587854 RFP: getdp-sparskit -- general environment for the treatment of discrete problems
> > noowner 587854
> > thanks
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > This is an automatic email to change the status of getdp-sparskit back from ITP
> > (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
> > any activity during the last 6 months.
> > 
> > If you are still interested in adopting getdp-sparskit, please send a mail to
> > <control@bugs.debian.org> with:
> > 
> >  retitle 587854 ITP: getdp-sparskit -- general environment for the treatment of discrete problems
> >  owner 587854 !
> >  thanks
> > 
> > However, it is not recommended to keep ITP for a long time without acting on
> > the package, as it might cause other prospective maintainers to refrain from
> > packaging that software. It is also a good idea to document your progress on
> > this ITP from time to time, by mailing <587854@bugs.debian.org>.
> > 
> > Thank you for your interest in Debian,
> 
> Hi,
> I manage to create a package for getdp-sparkit within the latest getdp
> source package which is in unstable.
> 
> Shall I rebuild a new getdp to close this bug?

I don't understand. Is getdp-sparkit a binary package from the
getdp source package? If so, you don't need an ITP for it.

- Lucas