[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#562990: marked as done (RFP: protoaculous -- a compressed library containing both prototype and scriptaculous)



Your message dated Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:29:04 -0500
with message-id <20110219122904.49d0539d.michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#562990: protoaculous: changing back from ITP to RFP
has caused the Debian Bug report #562990,
regarding RFP: protoaculous -- a compressed library containing both prototype and scriptaculous
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
562990: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562990
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: ITP: protoaculous -- a compressed library containing both prototype and scriptaculous
Package: wnpp
Owner: Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : protoaculous
  Version         : None
  Upstream Author : None
* URL             : http://www.boogdesign.com/b2evo/index.php/2008/05/27/compressed_prototype_scriptaculous
* License         : MIT
  Programming Lang: Javascript
  Description     : a compressed library containing both prototype and scriptaculous

 This package provides a packed and compressed version of the prototype
 and scriptaculous javascript libraries.  It is used in various web
 apps such as citadel-webcit.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:06:48 +0000 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> This is an automatic email to change the status of protoaculous back from ITP
> (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
> any activity during the last 6 months.

This was already uploaded, but the bug didn't get closed :)

Mike


--- End Message ---

Reply to: