[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#613517: Review of the copyright file of libsbsms_1.7.0-1.



user debian-legal@lists.debian.org
usertag 613517 one-copyright-review
thanks

Dear Benjamin,

In the hope of speeding up and strenghtening the processing of NEW I had a look
at your package. The rationale is explained in the proposal in the following
wiki page: http://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview

I found that the files m4/ac_c99_func_*.m4 were not documented in your copyright
file. I attached a patch.

If you update your package, this will not change its seat number in the NEW
queue, and it may save you some time, in case the package were rejected for the
error above.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
>From 834882bbbb274f79a91a6e778dce2fd3ba80fb29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:33:01 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Document=20the=20license=20and=20copyright=20of=20=E2=80=98m4/ac=5Fc99=5Ffunc=5F*.m4=E2=80=99.?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

---
 debian/copyright |    9 +++++++++
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/copyright b/debian/copyright
index a2c84d3..3fe39f1 100644
--- a/debian/copyright
+++ b/debian/copyright
@@ -18,6 +18,15 @@ Files: src/real.h
 Copyright: 2001-2003, Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd@mega-nerd.com>
 License: GPL-2+
 
+Files: m4/ac_c99_func_*.m4
+Copyright: Erik de Castro Lopo <erikd AT mega-nerd DOT com>
+License: other
+ Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this file for any 
+ purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that the above copyright 
+ and this permission notice appear in all copies.  No representations are
+ made about the suitability of this software for any purpose.  It is 
+ provided "as is" without express or implied warranty.
+
 Files: debian/*
 Copyright: 2011, Benjamin Drung <bdrung@debian.org>
 License: GPL-2+
-- 
1.7.2.3


Reply to: