[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#543964: marked as done (ITP: python-orbited -- HTTP daemon that is optimized for long-lasting comet connections)

Your message dated Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:48:39 +0100
with message-id <4D14DCF7.2040706@edagames.com>
and subject line python-orbited not really maintained upstream
has caused the Debian Bug report #543964,
regarding ITP: python-orbited -- HTTP daemon that is optimized for long-lasting comet connections
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
543964: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543964
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jeremy Lal <kapouer@melix.org>


* Package name    : python-orbited
  Version         : 0.7.10
  Upstream Author : Michael Carter <CarterMichael@gmail.com>
* URL             : http://www.orbited.org/
* License         : MIT
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : HTTP daemon that is optimized for long-lasting comet connections

It provides a pure JavaScript/HTML socket in the browser.
It is a web router and firewall that allows you to integrate web
applications with arbitrary back-end systems.
You can implement any network protocol in the browser—without
resorting to plugins.

The client-side files are separately packaged in libjs-orbited.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
python-orbited is great, however, due to lack of upstream development, and
also because its usage does not seem to spread,
i do not intent to upload it in debian.

Hence i'm closing this bug, for now.

Jérémy.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: