[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#535426: marked as done (ITP: rtkit -- Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:48:08 +0000
with message-id <E1PGf04-0005iv-02@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#535426: fixed in rtkit 0.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #535426,
regarding ITP: rtkit -- Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

535426: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=535426
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luke Yelavich <themuso@themuso.com>

* Package name    : rtkit
  Version         : 0.3
  Upstream Author : Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
* URL             : http://0pointer.de/public
* License         : GPL3 and MIT/X11 (BSD like)
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon

  RealtimeKit is a D-Bus system service that changes the
  scheduling policy of user processes/threads to SCHED_RR
  (i.e. realtime scheduling mode) on request. It is intended to
  be used as a secure mechanism to allow real-time scheduling to
  be used by normal user processes.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: rtkit
Source-Version: 0.9-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rtkit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to main/r/rtkit/rtkit_0.9-1.debian.tar.gz
  to main/r/rtkit/rtkit_0.9-1.dsc
  to main/r/rtkit/rtkit_0.9-1_amd64.deb
  to main/r/rtkit/rtkit_0.9.orig.tar.gz

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 535426@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
Luke Yelavich <themuso@ubuntu.com> (supplier of updated rtkit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 14:22:37 -0400
Source: rtkit
Binary: rtkit
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 0.9-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers <pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Luke Yelavich <themuso@ubuntu.com>
 rtkit      - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon
Closes: 535426
 rtkit (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
   * Initial Debian package. (Closes: #535426)
 77f5aaf19d941ad484e23330fd9aa4691ccb70d9 1309 rtkit_0.9-1.dsc
 94f6f896cd56b6dac2b69f6c47e4cd81c51de30c 159498 rtkit_0.9.orig.tar.gz
 5e775782fb0c4e477ec1731225b73163a10db131 2985 rtkit_0.9-1.debian.tar.gz
 cea3a62f4a8fe109e304b18403c89f4e4d143001 34746 rtkit_0.9-1_amd64.deb
 13bacbe343a55fd90abcb9a24a1b345a262783842bc4a562c9ae1f5fc90744d3 1309 rtkit_0.9-1.dsc
 5236ab2db3a1e6d34d0fcb11572b769a8989ba47b3cb282659f9315ed9143921 159498 rtkit_0.9.orig.tar.gz
 87a4b6bf6b9c409ba673d62f157dfbec5cb1288546fc37836990a6b72f9cab39 2985 rtkit_0.9-1.debian.tar.gz
 b5c5624fe9836ece2bcb2c6627805fe09653eefbecba138f2575220dcfbdb8e7 34746 rtkit_0.9-1_amd64.deb
 48ca91e5a6726e15ca23697021043458 1309 admin optional rtkit_0.9-1.dsc
 9d0b8893c5eb17cc58635bb867b23165 159498 admin optional rtkit_0.9.orig.tar.gz
 2d784992112a346cacc021dc462133fc 2985 admin optional rtkit_0.9-1.debian.tar.gz
 9f4a26c5e000c28ef55ed815e425e361 34746 admin optional rtkit_0.9-1_amd64.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)


--- End Message ---

Reply to: