Bug#561963: ITP: hudson -- extensible continuous integration server
On 22 September 2010 09:03, James Page <email@example.com> wrote:
> If the build from source objective is not achievable, what are the
> options for Debian in terms of binary packaging?
Well, for binary packages, there's the "non-free" archive, which isn't
really considered part of Debian. DFSG #2 requires source code, and
there are other practical reasons (i.e. security patches).
In the worst case, we could package up the patched dependencies under
a different name. To deal with the rapid pace of upstream
development, there is always the option of not uploading every point
release. Obviously these are not ideal solutions, but we should be
able to get something together and on the mirrors.
Tim Retout <firstname.lastname@example.org>