Bug#585145: RFA: gtimelog -- minimal timelogging system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Sep 14, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 at 15:49:54 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> I request an adopter for the gtimelog package.
>
>Chris, have you made any progress since the version you sent me in
>early August?
>
>Barry Warsaw, an experienced Python developer, has also expressed
>interest in taking over maintenance of gtimelog in Debian and Ubuntu;
>I think working with him in one of the Debian Python packaging teams,
>using whatever version control system that team prefers, would be an
>excellent way to maintain this package.
>
>Steve McIntyre has mentioned that he might be willing to sponsor
>uploads, so I've Cc'd him.
Thanks Simon, and of course I'm very happy to work with Chris to maintain
gtimelog. I've worked with Marius who gave me commit privileges to the
upstream bzr branches (I'm a member of ~gtimelog-dev on Launchpad) and I have
upload rights to the Cheeseshop entry.
I have a branch with all new (and simplified) packaging up on Launchpad for
0.4.0. It's in a loom so you'll need the bzr-loom plugin to work with it.
I've switched over to quilt3.
https://code.launchpad.net/~gtimelog-dev/gtimelog/packaging
The packaging bits can be separated out for upload to Debian. If you're able
to review that, it would be great. Ideally, we'd get the new version into
Debian and sync it back to Ubuntu. I'm certainly willing to assist with that.
Feel free to ping me on #debian-python to discuss further. nick: barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=Ojf5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: