On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:50:32 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > >* Package name : libmojolicious-perl > Any news on above ITP? The only thing I know: It's in pkg-perl's svn repository with a note in debian/changelog about missing work. (And a newer upstream release is available.) > During my packaging I notice that upstream use "Artistic-2" as > license, which I believe is not DFSG-free. Hu? That's new to me. And you shouldn't tell it all Artistic-2-only packages in the archive :) > I notice Jonathan registered the ITP, but I guess it was on behalf > of the Perl team. Would it be ok that I release my packaging as > official (when the licensing issue is hopefully solved)? Or you could finish Jonathan's package ... (I don't care either way, I just suggest to avoid duplicated work as much as possible.) > My > packaging is on behalf of the Perl team, but one possible issue > could be that I use CDBS which Jonathan might not favor. In practice this means that hardly anybody will touch the package, but that's nothing new and not the first package in this situation :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- BOFH excuse #296: The hardware bus needs a new token.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature