Am Sonntag, den 25.04.2010, 20:46 -0400 schrieb Jameson Rollins: > There's actually already a package called "monkeysphere", with a > corresponding source package called "monkeysphere". Ok. On my first quick check I haven't found it (probably due to a typo). > The upstream source > for this package is actually being referred to as > "xul-ext-monkeysphere". Is there some reason that can't be used as the > source package name? There is no reason against it. I thought that the upstream project was called "monkeysphere", but I didn't recognized that is was a different package. My objection has become meaningless. You may want to use mozilla-devscripts [1] for packaging. Just a notice to upstream: "monkeysphere-extension" would be an alternative name to "xul-ext-monkeysphere". [1] http://wiki.debian.org/mozilla-devscripts -- Benjamin Drung Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil