[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#567008: marked as done (ITP: opendnssec-conf -- common configuration files for OpenDNSSEC suite)



Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:21:52 +0200
with message-id <u2q3221680d1004220021kaa773f1dv61f6d54de3ec2a4d@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #567008,
regarding ITP: opendnssec-conf -- common configuration files for OpenDNSSEC suite
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
567008: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567008
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ondřej Surý" <ondrej@debian.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


* Package name    : opendnssec-conf
  Version         : 1.0.0~rc3
  Upstream Author : Jakob Schlyter
* URL             : http://www.opendnssec.org/
* License         : BSD
  Programming Lang: XML
  Description     : common configuration files for OpenDNSSEC suite

 OpenDNSSEC is a complete DNSSEC zone signing system which is very
 easy to use with stability and security in mind.  There are a lot of
 details in signing zone files with DNSSEC and OpenDNSSEC covers most
 of it.
 .
 This package contains common configuration files.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktfECUACgkQ9OZqfMIN8nMSXQCfRmpiMm+4SynXICF6gtT4x3UT
t8kAn1M17iJOJC59/SOB2J+8tdlya1pr
=Cr6K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.0.0.dfsg-2


Ondrej
-- 
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>
http://blog.rfc1925.org/


--- End Message ---

Reply to: