[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#475160: ITP: ASCIIO - draw ASCII diagrams dynamically



owner 475160 !
thanks

Hello,
thanks for your fast response :) -- please keep the bug CCed, so we can 
publicly keep history of the ITP.

On Friday 19 March 2010 12:03:37, Jeremiah Foster wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:57 AM, David Paleino wrote:
> > What's the status of your ITP? Do you still want to package it?
> >
> > I just had a look at the current asciio code, and it's missing a couple
> > of dependencies from Debian. I'm going to file appropriate ITP/RFP bugs
> > blocking this one.
> >
> > If you're not interested anymore, I am. Just tell me, and I'll take the
> > ITP over :)
> 
> Wow, cool. I think its great that you want to work on this! I will
>  definitely help but since you're taking the initiative, you should take
>  over the ITP.

Done with this mail :)

> I know the author (Nadim Khemir) so if we need his help (like in getting
>  him to remove the dependencies on half of CPAN) I am happy to contact him.
>  :-)

That's great!
However, I do not see a real problem about depending on missing modules -- we 
just need them packaged.
Here's my plan: I'm going to check what packages are exactly need to build/run 
asciio, and file RFPs. That's because I don't really want to maintain Perl 
modules just because they happen to be dependencies to a package I want to 
maintain. In case those RFPs aren't picked up by the Debian Perl Team, I'm 
available to make them ITPs, and maintain them "pro tempore".

From a quick analysis, I see that it's "only" missing 3 dependencies:

 - Eval::Context
 - Data::TreeDumper::Renderer::GTK
 - Directory::Scratch::Structured

Sure, these might need other modules to work, and that's why the "blocking" 
mechanism exists. We just need to climb up the dependency chain until it's 
satisfied.

> Let me know what you want me to do to help - I think there are still a
>  bunch of dependencies. If you want we can split them up and I'll try to
>  keep up with you?

What exactly needs to be split up from the code?


Have a nice day,
David

-- 
 . ''`.   Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino
 : :'  : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/
 `. `'`  GPG: 1392B174 ----|----
   `-   2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: