Bug#520324: Any news on this? :)
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:40:48PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Only blocking issues are that there are some subtrees licensed GPL or
> > LGPL without any version info given; while those need to be GPLv2 or
> > later in order to have a chance to be compatible with Apache 2.0.
>
> The GPL and LGPL when specified with no license version restriction
> explicitly allow the recipient to use any version ever published by the FSF.
> So this is not a problem.
curious ... is that written in the GPL itself?
- Alexander
Reply to: