--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: ITP: asterisk-espeak -- eSpeak text-to-speech module for Asterisk
- From: Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 22:54:57 -0700
- Message-id: <20080409055457.13360.77603.reportbug@caesar.andrew.net.au>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org>
* Package name : asterisk-espeak
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Francois Aucamp <faucamp@csir.co.za>
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/asterisk-espeak
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : eSpeak text-to-speech module for Asterisk
This package provides the "eSpeak" dialplan application, which allows you to
use the eSpeak TTS Engine with Asterisk.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-3-686
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 08:58:38PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 03:31:26AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> >On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:35:20PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>What is the status of packaging asterisk-espeak? Are you still
> >>interested? Do you perhaps half-baked packages lying around
> >>somewhere that others (like me) eager to play with it could grab and
> >>unofficially (re)package?
> >>
> >
> >The package was rejected by ftp-master because of licensing conflicts
> >in the source, and upstream has never gotten back to me about doing a
> >new release addressing those issues. I figure it's not worth having a
> >package with a totally unresponsive upstream.
>
> Interesting. Thanks for clarifying.
>
> For the record (since you didn't elaborate): It seems the licensing
> conflict is that asterisk-espeak is licensed as GPL-2 (and no newer!)
> similarly to Asterisk itself, while espeak is licensed as GPL-3+. In
> other words espeak cannot be linked with with Asterisk :-/
Well the sole problem that was called out in the rejection was that the
README file said "GPL 3 or later", but everything else said "GPL 2". The
copyright assertions in the source only say "GPL 2".
> Now that we have the updated status tied to the actual bugreport, I
> suggest you close it, to not having it hanging around with potentially
> more people than just me foolishly waiting for progress that will not
> happen. :-)
>
No worries. Closing.
--- End Message ---