On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 23:34:31 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:20:57 +0100 Alastair McKinstry wrote:
[...]
I've been looking at packaging SILO, a mandatory dependency of
VisIt.
[...]
This seems to be very awkward: a Free Software application (VisIt)
which links with a non-free library (Silo) by the same authors!
:-(
AFAIK, this is a show-stopper for packaging VisIT. We could write
to
LLNL and see if they
are willing to relinquish this,
I think this should definitely be done.
I got in touch with Silo's upstream.
They quickly replied in an encouraging manner.
First thing they told me is that Silo is no longer a mandatory
dependency for VisIt: they say it's been an *optional* dependency for
quite some time.
Alastair, did you try building VisIt without enabling the Silo plugin?
I think VisIt could be packaged for Debian (main) with the Silo plugin
disabled, while we wait for upstream to re-license Silo in a DFSG-free
manner...
Does it sound feasible?
but since I started this ITP, Paraview has been packaged for
Debian, and it does my visualisation needs, so I am no longer
packaging visit.
Sorry about this,
Alastair, does the above pieces of news change anything with respect
to
your willingness to package VisIt?
Please let me know: thanks in advance.
--
New location for my website! Update your bookmarks!
http://www.inventati.org/frx
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4