[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#512010: marked as done (ITP: pyblock -- python interface for working with block devices)



Your message dated Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:36:30 +0530
with message-id <200910132136.30968.rrs@researchut.com>
and subject line Closing bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #512010,
regarding ITP: pyblock -- python interface for working with block devices
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
512010: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512010
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : python-pyblock
  Version         : 0.31
  Upstream Author : Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
* URL             : http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/pyblock.git
* License         : GPLv2 or GPLv3
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : python interface for working with block devices

The pyblock contains Python modules for dealing with block devices.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Closing this RFP request since pyblock is of no use in Debian. The upstream 
development is focused only for Anaconda and there doesn't seem to be any plan 
in making it a generic python block library.


Ritesh
-- 
Ritesh Raj Sarraf
RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com
"Necessity is the mother of invention."

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: