[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#490787: replacement for evms?





Packages like cman and clvm (Red Hat's cluster LVM) are available in Debian, is this the recommended enterprise solution now? It would be good to point people in the right direction, and let them know what is the strategic solution for Debian.

The wiki page http://wiki.debian.org/EVMS states that `you probably don't want to go down this road', but doesn't really suggest any alternatives.

The `Short' description, `An LVM + SoftwareRAID + Filesystem all-in-one userspace system solution.', really doesn't do justice to EVMS's enterprise features (such as cluster safe operation) that are completely lacking from LVM.

Also, the comment that `EVMS was a good idea in it's time' suggests that EVMS's features are no long relevant - for many enterprise users, the benefits offered by EVMS when compared to LVM are just as important today.

While it's quite fair to decide that the lack of upstream support is a good reason not to continue maintaining it in Debian, it would be useful if you could clarify whether there is a recommended alternative for some of the use cases that EVMS fulfills. Adding such comments to the wiki and/or this RFA might help people who come across this as they decide whether it is a package they want to adopt, or whether there are better solutions for them.

An example of EVMS functionality that is not present in LVM: cluster safe access to a volume group, e.g. several hosts have shared access to a VG (through fibre channel), and each host mounts different volumes in the VG. Using LVM, all the hosts have to be shutdown before making meta-data changes (e.g. adding a new LV). With EVMS, however, it should be safe to add a new LV while other hosts are using the same volume group.




Reply to: