Hi Enrico! On Mon, 04 May 2009 21:01:42 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 04:37:48PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote: > >> > I named it 0.1.0 due to the fact that there are no tags yet in the >> > upstream git repository. >> >> This is wrong, sorry, because it will conflict if upstream will release >> a 0.1.0 version. I would prefer something similar to the >> linux-2.6-openmoko package and indeed the Debian Git repository has an >> upstream tag, 20090302.git451398a2: > [...] >> the Debian package version should be 20090503.gitb5eb5f79-1. > > How about 0~20090503.gitb5eb5f79-1, so it can go to 0.1 if upstream > eventually decides to start making releases? Good point, I will do like you suggested, thanks! Thx, bye, Gismo / Luca
Attachment:
pgpuLCorCcY3n.pgp
Description: PGP signature