Police?! =P It was not clear to me who the copyright holder was. In a previous message, you made it clear that it was partly IOLA and partly you, and that no one else held rights since they were very small changes. Since you are the only author not willing to update the copyright information in the file headers, and you have stated that to me, I'm OK with using the information from your email only. Cheers, On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 21:23 +0200, Ole Laursen wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal) > <metal@alucinados.com> wrote: > > Besides including a MIT LICENSE file, could you, please, add you as > > copyright holder in the headers? > > Oh no, the license police. :) Why do you want that? So it's clear who > has the copyright? But why is that necessary? > > The reason I'm asking is that I've never seen a copyright notice that > didn't suffer from bit rot after a while. So I would rather have no > information than incorrect unless there's good reason to do otherwise.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part