[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#510275: marked as done (ITP: krypt -- KDE GUI for managing volumes encrypted with LUKS)

Your message dated Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:34:19 +0200
with message-id <200902101334.19667.v13@v13.gr>
and subject line No longer needed
has caused the Debian Bug report #510275,
regarding ITP: krypt -- KDE GUI for managing volumes encrypted with LUKS
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
510275: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=510275
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stefanos Harhalakis <v13@it.teithe.gr>


* Package name    : krypt
  Version         : 0.2
  Upstream Author : Jakub Schmidtke <sjakub@users.berlios.de>
* URL             : http://krypt.berlios.de/
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description     : KDE GUI for managing volumes encrypted with LUKS

I'm willing to maintain this package for debian. It is also requested with
RFP #507655. To my knowledge (and to wnpp lists) noone else is working on it.
It seems an easy to package program that should not be hard to maintain.

Krypt is a nice gui, very nicely integraded in KDE 3.5, for easy mounting of
LUKS encrypted volumes (like USB sticks).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
krypt is not going to enter lenny and KDE 4.2 has LUKS support, so this ITP is 
practically useless.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: