Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 00:28, Benjamin E. Seidenberg > <benjamin@dlgeek.net> wrote: > >> rename 531630 RFA: graphmonkey -- a GTK#-based graphing calculator >> thanks >> >> Uh... >> Thanks for doing all of the following: >> - Emailing me to check if I actually was inactive >> - /msg'ing me on IRC (I'm on both freenode and OFTC. Hell, I'm even >> sitting in #debian-devel!) >> - Giving any other kind of warning >> >> Oh wait, you didn't do any of these things! >> > > Thanks for your sarcasm, completely un-needed. Keep it for others. You > are a maintainer, your should maintain package, if you don't have > time/wish to do so, orphan them. Stop. > > 1 wishlist bug and 1 normal bug do not make a package unmaintained. Really, the request for new upstream should be of priority: wishlist anyway. That's not an unmaintained package. >> For the record, I have an upload partially prepared to fix some of the >> outstanding bugs, but was waiting until after the Lenny release since it >> bumps the upstream version. >> > > Experimental is out of your possibilities? > I decided it wasn't worth it for a crappy graphing calculator that is used by about 5 people with a upstream release that has very few changes. It also doesn't help the transition since transitions have to be done in unstable. > >> Your commitment to detail is impeccable. >> > > Like yours: bts command is retitle not rename; congrats for being a > jerk for the sake of nothing. > I already had sent a follow up mail fixing this. I consider the orphaning of a package without any kind of consultation or warning to be a rude act, and thus replied in kind. > >> That being said, if you think someone else can do better, feel free to >> adopt. Really, the package probably should be dropped for being >> worthless, but it actually has a small install base so I haven't done that. >> > > pkg-cli team is the right place, and they express interest in the > package (see the correct retitle to ITA). > If they had expressed interest to me, I would have been more than happy to hand the package over. However, I have never received any kind of email, bug, IRC message or any other communication expressing an interest in adopting this package. Someone from the pkg-cli team: If you'd like to contact me, I'd be more than happy to hand the package over without the whole RFA/ITA process. Or, retitle this bug.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature