[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#479203: marked as done (ITP: libclass-workflow-perl -- Lightweight workflow system)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:51:16 +0000
with message-id <20091117205116.GA6566@labrie.wayforth.com>
and subject line Closing non-required ITPs
has caused the Debian Bug report #479203,
regarding ITP: libclass-workflow-perl -- Lightweight workflow system
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
479203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479203
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Antony Gelberg <antony@wayforth.co.uk>


* Package name    : libclass-workflow-perl
  Version         : 0.09
  Upstream Author : Yuval Kogman <nothingmuch@woobling.org>
* URL             : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Workflow/
* License         : GPL / Artistic
  Programming Lang: Perl
  Description     : Lightweight workflow system

Assists in building a state machine, with states and transitions between
those states.  It also provides for restrictions i.e. transitions that 
are not allowed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
I no longer need these modules, and nobody else seems interested at the
present time, so I'm closing the ITPs.

Antony

--- End Message ---
Reply to: