[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#513974:



Hi

Sorry about the late reply, I've been traveling till this evening and am 
still a little busy till the end of the week.

On Monday 09 November 2009, Onkar Shinde wrote:
> I am interested in testing this in Debian. My laptop has wireless card
> based on 4306 chipset. Please let me know when you have a package
> ready for testing.

The packages (b43-asm and openfwwf) are basically ready since february and 
have just waited for a compatible kernel (>=2.6.31) to enter Debian/ 
unstable, because the proposed (kernel-) backports have been ignored by 
the kernel team so far.

Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.berlios.de/fullstory/b43-asm/trunk
Vcs-Browser: http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/fullstory/b43-asm/trunk
http://sidux.com/debian/pool/fix.main/b/b43-asm/

Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.berlios.de/fullstory/openfwwf/trunk
Vcs-Browser: http://svn.berlios.de/wsvn/fullstory/openfwwf/trunk/
http://sidux.com/debian/pool/fix.main/o/openfwwf/

I've been successfully using them with BCM4306 and BCM4318 (and have 
positive feedback for BCM4311) since kernel 2.6.28 (with the required
backports):
http://svn.berlios.de/svnroot/repos/fullstory/openfwwf/trunk/debian/README.Debian

What's left to do, in order to upload them to Debian proper (I hope I can 
find a little time next weekend to do the final cosmetics and talk with 
the potential sponsor):
- add get-orig-source to b43-asm, to fetch sources from upstream git 
  (there are no release tarballs, nor "ever" will according to upstream)
- either add a boilerplate README.source to explain quilt usage or moving 
  to source version "3.0 (quilt)", given that I really hate those useless 
  README.source boilerplates just for standard quilt (or dpatch) usage, 
  I'd personally tend to v3.0 - but this depends on the preferences of the 
  potential sponsor of coourse.
- adding lintian overrides where needed <-- neither upstream has any 
  intention to drop an upstream changelog in a standard location
- bump standards version to 3.8.3 for b43-asm, no (further) changes 
  necessary

OpenFWWF isn't perfect, the hardware coverage is severely limited and there
are known bugs (under investigation upstream)[1], furthermore the source, 
even though being the genuine preferred form of modification is basically 
read-only, without learning the bcm-v4 specifications by heart and serious 
efforts to understand the state-machine and having access to good signal 
analyzers and wlan testing equipment - but it still just works for rev 5 
core b43 cards, including ap support and noisy environments.

> Cheers,
> Onkar

Regards
	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann

[1]	http://www.ing.unibs.it/openfwwf/
[2]	http://bcm-v4.sipsolutions.net/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: