Hi On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 11:26:04PM +0200, oliva.g@na.icar.cnr.it wrote: > Hi, > I do agree with Manuel objections. > Maybe you can call it ant-sinfo, from the name of the laboratory where > the tool is developed. > Best Regards > -- > Gennaro > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 04:07:36PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote: > > Hi Gaudenz! > > > > As it seems, the executable is named "sinfo", which is already supplied > > in the SLURM batch system package (slurm-llnl). Because both packages > > are useful on clusters, a Conflicts does not make sense, so renaming > > seems to be the best option. I CC'ed Gennaro (slurm-llnl maintainer) so > > he can comment. I'll write to the upstream author about the nameing conflict. The best way to go would be to rename the upstream package. What's the purpose of the sinfo binary in the slurm-llnl package? If it has the same or a very similar purpose and interface, an alternative would be another possibility. In the mean time until this is sorted out, I'll rename the binaries to sinfo-ant. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature