Bug#520662: O: iceape -- The Iceape Internet Suite
On 20/08/09 at 19:45 +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:13:38PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Mike and all,
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 06:45:01PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > Package: wnpp
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > >
> > > > See the great thread about "Sponsorship requirements and copyright files" on
> > > > debian-devel to understand why.
> > > >
> > >
> > > This is now 5 months old and (no surprisingly) nobody adopted iceape, time to ask
> > > for removal?
> >
> > Let's just keep the bug this way, it's currently not really orphaned,
> > but in desperate need for hands.
> >
>
> OK :)
> But then... rename it to RFH? If it keeps orphaned it will be constantly appearing
> in the radar of the QA team as "too much time orphaned package look at removal".
Well, having been orphaned for only 5 months, it's not really on
anybody's radar ;)
But I agree that RFH or RFA would be better. 'O' should not be used for
packages that are not really orphaned.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
Reply to: