[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#538881: ITP: libweed0 -- Library for inclusion of plugins into LiVES



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Christian Marillat wrote:
> Harry Rickards <hrickards@l33tmyst.com> writes:
> 
>> Christian Marillat wrote:
>>> Harry Rickards <hrickards@l33tmyst.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 27 Jul 2009, at 20:57, Christian Marillat <marillat@free.fr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Harry Rickards <hrickards@l33tmyst.com> writes:
> 
> [Added Salsaman in the Cc:]
> 
>>> A separate *package* not a separate *tarball*. Do you see the difference ?
>> Yes I do, but do I not need to still submit an ITP?
> 
> No. One ITP by tarball and not one ITP by package.

Okay, I'll close the ITP bug.

>>>> Also I can't find the link, but there's a mailing list post somewhere
>>>> on lives-devel saying that libweed is now avaliable as a standalone
>>>> library.
>>> Again did you try to do a lives package with my Debian work ?
>>>
>>> http://www.debian-multimedia.org/pool/main/l/lives/
>> No, I used  the work at http://sid.ethz.ch/debian/lives/nyu/, which was
>> the link upstream gave me.
> 
> The diff in this link doesn't provides packages for the shared library
> when my diff does. Then which diff do you think is the best for you ?

As far as I can tell your diff provides libweed as part of the lives
package. You also seem to have a binary only libweed package, which
would mean that lives wouldn't be accepted into the main repo.

> Also this diff is for Lives 0.9.9.7 when mine is for 1.0.0

I had already updated the packages I was using to 1.0.0 before even
beginning this conversation.

> I package lives since 3 years now, do you think that my packages are
> broken ?

No, I don't think your packages are broken, I just was given a link to
the  other ones before.

> Christian


- --
Thanks
Harry Rickards <hrickards@l33tmyst.com>

GPG Key Info:
pub   1024R/58449F6F 2009-06-12
uid                  Harry Rickards (OpenPGP Card) <hrickards@l33tmyst.com>
sub   1024R/D775CCEE 2009-06-12
sub   1024R/9394048C 2009-06-12
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iJwEAQECAAYFAkpuw7gACgkQ+9DWHFhEn29tVQP5Aa56MS0DC4Q5vS3WDcrkfkJn
iCWXo3DfjgSw6OvXcGbjWdW/PRaTTf/JWL5XwLAkjIjmwnLb5R4iXRj4e0DteSdM
1WqPGFQwxslJDp3ALoUHEKR1ZSblNK7G77RMF0VjVwpJF+rWsmmiYXPDzgGheGlF
RwdCsYPQ1J723Ksg10o=
=qpNY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: