Bug#403619: ITP: languagetool -- rule-based language checker
>>>>> "RE" == Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> writes:
RE> Hi,
RE> Rail Aliev wrote:
>> Currently I use "openoffice.org-languagetool" for binary package
>> name. Is this name suitable or should I use plain "languagetool"?
RE> Both :) Actually, you should create a multi-binary package.
RE> Just the OOo extension should be named openoffice.org-languagetool.
RE> AFAIR there's also a standalone Java app, that should be in
RE> languagetool.
Hmm. Good to know. OOo extension is ready, need to investigate how
standlaone version works.
RE> See e.g. the writer2latex source package for inspiration.
RE> Please also do not forget to patch out any bundling of jars into the oxt
RE> and just depend on the libs used from openoffice.org-languagetool
RE> (and for languagetool anyway)
Already done ;)
See http://bzr.debian.org/users/rail-guest/languagetool/ for packaging
and http://alioth.debian.org/~rail-guest/languagetool/ for ready
packages.
--
Best regars,
Rail Aliev
Reply to: