On 09/04/09 18:52 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag said ... > On 09/04/09 10:12 +0200, Mauro Baluda said ... > > is the static analyzer available in the version you packged for debian > > sid? I can't find any scan-build command > > In case there is sufficient interest, I will consider packaging the > version of clang that was tagged (in SVN) alongside a release of llvm. Contrary to what I thought earlier (that I would be able to pull clang from SVN at the revision when LLVM 2.5 was tagged, and build it without any issues), I encountered a few issues. Turns out that LLVM 2.5 was branched off a while before 2.5 was tagged, but clang was not branched -- it continues to be developed and depends on LLVM "trunk", and the code that is added to clang trunk may depend on what is LLVM trunk and that may not be on the 2.5 branch. In order to workaround this, I had to revert a few changes, specifically r64928, r63630, r64875, r64967, r63814 (these are small changes) and the whole RangeConstraintManager code. The code compiles OK but I am encoutering runtime issues now. Even though I would be able to fix these, I don't think I should upload this to experimental. Depending on how this pans out, I will probably provide packages from a private repository and re-visit this when LLVM 2.6 is released. Ofcourse, the best thing to do would be to prepare experimental packages of both LLVM and clang from trunk. Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://appaji.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature