Dear Andres, Am Montag, den 23.03.2009, 13:07 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel: > Am Freitag, den 30.01.2009, 02:14 -0500 schrieb Andres Mejia: > > Just thought I mention what needs to be done before xbmc can even be > > considered for upload to Debian (and just about any distro for that matter). > > > > So far, I've encountered two issues that need to be resolved before xbmc can > > be uploaded. > > > > 1. xbmc needs to use system libraries instead of the internal libraries > > provided in the source. > > 2. xbmc needs to follow the requirements of the FHS. > > > > I am currently working on the first issue. For anyone interested, you can > > checkout the changes I've implemented in their SVN repo under the > > external-libraries-support branch. I merge fairly frequently with the > > linuxport branch so that the only difference between the two branches is that > > one supports the use of external libraries. > > > > Any help is welcome. For anyone interested, here's a good place to start > > => http://xbmc.org/wiki/?title=XBMC_for_Linux > > > > Here's a place for any feedback on the external libraries support > > => http://xbmc.org/trac/ticket/5416 > > Thank you very much for your work in getting XBMC packaged for Debian. > > Could you give a status update on your work? And even better could you > provide packages in a private repository for testing? > > As you probably know there are also packages for Ubuntu available [1]. > Do you guys work together to save work? As you probably know XBMC 9.04 (Babylon) Beta 1 was released some days ago [3]. XBMC could probably attract more users and get more testing, if it is packaged for Debian. Could you give us a status update, please? Thanks a lot, Paul > [1] http://xbmc.org/forum/showthread.php?t=33327 > [2] https://edge.launchpad.net/~team-xbmc-svn/+archive/ppa [3] http://xbmc.org/blog/2009/04/23/xbmc-904-babylon-beta-1-released/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil