[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#468328: HairyDairyMaid / Re: Bug#468328: urjtag status



Hi,

we try to make UrJTAG as capable as HairyDairyMaid; today, as far as I
know, there shouldn't be much of a difference regarding the supported
flash chips and target systems. But as HairyDairyMaid is a bit more
specialized in just programming flash chips, it might work a little
better with some particular target systems than UrJTAG.

It is correct to make openwince-jtag and UrJTAG conflict, because both
provide an executable named "jtag". UrJTAG is meant to replace
old versions of openwince-jtag. Actually, it's simply a new version that
lost its relation to the other openwince software.

Kolja Waschk




Reply to: