[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#519752: RFP: pysolfc -- A Python solitaire game collection



Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : pysolfc
* URL             : http://pysolfc.sourceforge.net/
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: Python
  Description     : A Python solitaire game collection


>From WWW-site of that game:

        "PySolFC is a collection of more than 1000 solitaire card games.
        It is a fork of PySol Solitaire.

        There are games that use the 52 card International Pattern deck,
        games for the 78 card Tarock deck, eight and ten suit Ganjifa
        games, Hanafuda games, Matrix games, Mahjongg games, and games
        for an original hexadecimal-based deck.

        Its features include modern look and feel (uses Tile widget set),
        multiple cardsets and tableau backgrounds, sound, unlimited undo,
        player statistics, a hint system, demo games, a solitaire wizard,
        support for user written plug-ins, an integrated HTML help browser,
        and lots of documentation."

Even original author of PySol recommends this fork:

http://www.pysol.org/

        "As of 2008 any work on PySol has stopped, and PySol is officially
        discontinued.

        Fortunately a number of enthusiastic people have continued from
        where I left off and have created the PySol Fan Club edition.
        Please contribute all your patches and enhancements to this new
        project."


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (101, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

-- 
Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juhtolv
"ore wo mitsumeteiru anata sama wa ossharu bakari. kesshite dakiyosete wa
kurenai ooki na anata no te. ore no tanjoubi ni wa ai wo kai ataeru. kyou wa
kumori nochi ame."                                               Dir en grey



Reply to: