Bug#516351: ITP: see -- lightweight Linux text file and manpage viewer
MK wrote:
> Mark Eriksen (the upstream author) here.
>
> My desire for the binary and package name would be "seetxt", which I
> have not been able to find any conflicts by googling.
>
IMO, the best way to find conflicts is to use apt-file, not google.
For example:
$ apt-file search /usr/bin/see
blast2: /usr/bin/seedtop
emboss: /usr/bin/seealso
kannel: /usr/bin/seewbmp
mime-support: /usr/bin/see
outguess: /usr/bin/seek_script
seesat5: /usr/bin/seesat5
> I will probably then also use a softlink to the binary, "seeman",
> which shouldn't conflict either.
What will be the difference between seeman and seetxt? What's the point of
having seetxt pointing to seeman?
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدقي
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~dogguy
Tel.: (+33).1.44.27.28.38
Reply to: