Bug#516351: ITP: see -- lightweight Linux text file and manpage viewer
> Mark Eriksen (the upstream author) here.
> My desire for the binary and package name would be "seetxt", which I
> have not been able to find any conflicts by googling.
IMO, the best way to find conflicts is to use apt-file, not google.
$ apt-file search /usr/bin/see
> I will probably then also use a softlink to the binary, "seeman",
> which shouldn't conflict either.
What will be the difference between seeman and seetxt? What's the point of
having seetxt pointing to seeman?
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدقي