Bug#514690: Regarding RFS: Artha

> I would not recommend to try this to others. ;-)
Point taken. Gee! That (checking in) was fast for a single dosage of pestering ;)

Thanks for checking in the control files. I have received a mail telling that the ITP bug is now tagged 'pending'. Also a mail on artha_0.8.0-1_i386 which says

(new) artha_0.8.0-1.diff.gz optional utils
(new) artha_0.8.0-1.dsc optional utils
(new) artha_0.8.0-1_i386.deb optional utils

and in the end "Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions."

So what does these mean? What file is it talking about? Also, if I had received one for i386, why didn't I receive one for amd64? I am confused :-|

I wanted to understand the underlying process.

Thanks

Best Regards
Sundaram

From: Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de>
To: Sundaram <legends2k@yahoo.com>
Cc: Artha DebianBug <514690@bugs.debian.org>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 12:26:16 AM
Subject: Re: Regarding RFS: Artha

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Sundaram wrote:

> Wow! Never knew you would recommend pestering :0

SUre - but I have only the right to advise this for one
single person (=me). I would not recommend to try this to
others. ;-)

> I am perfectly fine by the usage of cdbs, as you told earlier that its convenient for
> you to keep track.
> Well I will remind (pester) you again tomorrow night, as a precursor to the weekend's
> :)

Before you pester again:

http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-science/packages/artha/trunk/debian/?rev=0&sc=0

;-)

I also try to do the upload tomorrow ...

Kind regards

Andreas.

-- http://fam-tille.de