On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 07:27:58PM +0000, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > On mer, jan 28, 2009 at 01:30:23 +0000, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > It should mostly be a drop-in replacement for existing installs > > > using nscd. > > > > For what it's worth, I'm thinking packaging it in place of the > > current nscd that is a real PoS with too many issues to list. We may > > decide to just drop nscd in favor of unscd at once, hence it would > > be easier if maintained from within the glibc team. > > It's fine with me if it ends up being maintained by the glibc team > eventually; I just need unscd now becauser nscd being so hideous is > causing me no end of grief. > > It is a separate upstream, though, so it should be separate from glibc > source-wise. I do plan on making it so that it can easily be installed > in place of nscd. I know it's a separate upstream, but it's a drop-in replacement, to the point where it can read /etc/nsdcd.conf, so my goal was to just drop nscd from the libc package at once and replace it with unscd. (replacing nscd with a transition package and all that). -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgp6tQIcgBesU.pgp
Description: PGP signature