[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#501341: marked as done (ITP: libcatalyst-action-rest-perl -- Automated REST Method Dispatching)

Your message dated Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:23:33 +0100
with message-id <20090122202333.GA4389@grupoikusnet.com>
and subject line Upstream does not reply
has caused the Debian Bug report #501341,
regarding ITP: libcatalyst-action-rest-perl -- Automated REST Method Dispatching
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
501341: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=501341
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Angel Abad <angel@grupoikusnet.com>


* Package name    : libcatalyst-action-rest-perl
  Version         : 0.66
  Upstream Author : Adam Jacob <adam@stalecoffee.org>
* URL             : http://search.cpan.org/~jshirley/Catalyst-Action-REST-0.66/
* License         : Perl (Artistic and GPL) 
  Programming Lang: Perl
  Description     : Automated REST Method Dispatching

Catalyst::Controller::REST implements a mechanism for building RESTful
services in Catalyst. It does this by extending the normal Catalyst
dispatch mechanism to allow for different subroutines to be called based
on the HTTP Method requested, while also transparently handling all the
serialization/deserialization for you.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
I close this bug because the upstream authors does not reply my
emails.

Thanks

--- End Message ---
Reply to: