Bug#493645: nostromo vs boa?
Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Please note that the source tarball is tainted by both CVS directories
> and binaries, and thus likely needs to be repackaged for
> DFSG-cleanliness.
while i agree that having cvs meta data in a tarball is ugly and should
be avoided when doing the checkout to produce the tarball oneself, it's
not necessary in order to meet DFSG.
same with the binaries. if all binaries which end up in the .deb are
rebuild during te build process of the package, *and* all sources for
those binaries are included, they don't need to be removed in order to
meet DFSG.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
Reply to: