Bug#488117: Preliminary libv4l packages
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:54:51PM +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote:
> Hi,
Hi :)
> today I've started to package libv4l. Open issues:
> * Would it make sense to split the package into 3 libs, 3 -dev and maybe
> 2 preload libs? To me it seems to be pure overkill. Policy §8.1 seems to
> allow stuffing all libs into one package
yes, overkill. I would not split.
> * not sure if copyright file is correct
> * test with older comapt level than 7 to ease backporting
> * static libs are missing in -dev
I hope to find some time to review your package. Now it is not the right
moment. Sorry, again.
> I'd love to see this library going into Lenny before the freeze.
> Either through one of the original ITPers or maybe via a sponsored upload.
I am very sorry, had I been more determined in push libv4l to lenny it
would be already in. Unfortunately, now it is too late.
I will be happy to sponsor the upload.
cheers,
Domenico
-----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok
--[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc
---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50
Reply to: