[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#394566: Status update on conkeror in Debian



Hi Axel!

On Tue, 06 May 2008 16:39:28 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:43:13PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:57:48AM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
>>> ... but depends on xulrunner 1.9 which is not yet in Debian...
>>
>> xulrunner-1.9 is now in experimental, do you want to wait until it lands
>> in unstable or will we see conkeror in experimental as well?
>
> Since it's still in heavy developement I plan to put it into
> experimental first.

Fully ACK.

> My current plan is to rebuild the package from scratch again (and
> based on the newest version of xulrunner), now that I know that more
> local installation steps than I expected are unnecessary for packaging
> and the package will become leaner.
[...]
> It will btw give two packages: conkeror and
> conkeror-spawn-process-helper,
[...]
> (conkeror will recommend conkeror-spawn-process-helper and the package
> description will refer to that package, too.)

Yeah, I followed your posts on the conkeror mailing list [1] ;-)

> I can notify you, as soon as I have the new package ready for the NEW
> queue, so that you can have a look on it as soon as possible (and
> maybe even sponsor it... ;-)

I'm here for everything you need, testing, package checking and
sponsoring: you know how to contact me!

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca

Footnotes: 
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mozilla.conkeror/729/focus=757

Attachment: pgpRc4Ws2Mqrp.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: