Bug#461583: ITP: libdc1394-22
On Saturday 26 January 2008 00:11:09 Guus Sliepen wrote:
[...]
> > - Is there really a need to have 2 "utils" binary packages? They
> > even conflict with each other, and the "22" doesn't seem to make
> > any sense in this case.
>
> Hm, I agree that the "22" in the utils package is unnecessary. I'll try
> to remove it.
Hmm, AFAIK the utils package replaces the old 13 examples, and the binaries
there are linked to the SO 22 and not 13. So, you could replace the 13
examples.
Cheers,
Peter
--
Peter Antoniac, PhD
https://launchpad.net/~theseinfeld
GIT/CS a C+++ UL+++$ w--- PGP++ e++++
Reply to: