Processed: Re: Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned?

To: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
Cc: Daniel Glassey <wdg@debian.org> (bibletime #449353), <wnpp@debian.org> (wnpp #449353)
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned?
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:39:08 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.C.119920187830058.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <20080101153815.GA12865@xanadu.blop.info>
References: <20080101153815.GA12865@xanadu.blop.info>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 449353 normal
Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'

> reassign 449353 wnpp
Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `bibletime' to `wnpp'.

> retitle 449353 O: bibletime -- A bible study tool for KDE
Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned?
Changed Bug title to `O: bibletime -- A bible study tool for KDE' from `bibletime: should this package be orphaned?'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Bug#434826: Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?
Next by Date: Bug#451106: Bug#449355: llvm: should this package be removed?
Previous by thread: Bug#434826: Bug#449356: elfsh: should this package be orphaned?
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#449353: bibletime: should this package be orphaned?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread