Salvatore Bonaccorso scrisse: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "inkscape-textext". > > inkscape-textext - Inkscape extension for editable LaTeX text or > formula I'm not really in favor of this ITP, as it mainly seems as a wring reaction to the latex extension not working properly. All main inkscape extensions are maintained within the upstream repo as the extension interface is used to change a lot between each release, and so they could broke often. You should talk to textext upstream to better integrate with inkscape upstream. What is surely missing is a better separation of inkscape core and all other extensions, which was already proposed for 0.47 but not yet realized. I definitely would not welcome a one-package-per-extension policy, that is the field where your package is currently going. Thus I'm suggesting you to drop this ITP, work with Wolfram (which currently seems a bit busy) to fix the other two related bugs, suggest your upstream to get in touch with Inkscape developers to integrate the extension avoiding duplicate code and maybe start discussing a better extensions packaging (which would be really appreciate, IMHO). Cheers, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso) : :' : The Universal O.S. | lucab (AT) debian.org `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3 `- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Attachment:
pgphIZgKpcThN.pgp
Description: PGP signature