Bug#448208: RFS: amtterm
(I'm reordering your reply a bit)
Franklin PIAT <fpiat@bigfoot.com> writes:
>> Please tell me if you are interested in Co-Maintenance or if you prefer
>> if someone else would take over this ITP.
>
> I'm not using the packages myself, so you can take it over. I can remain
> co-maintainer if you want some help (we still need a sponsor).
Thanks for your work so far! Sponsoring your package is no problem for
me.
> I have also fixed lintian errors and other minor stuffs, and I have
> setup a repository, which could be moved to collab-maint.
> http://git.debian.org/?p=users/franklin-guest/amtterm.git
> Finally, i've uploaded that new package.
Excllent, thanks. I've cloned that branch and uploaded it to the
collab-maint repository. It seems that you are already in the collab
maint-maint group, so you can already commit here:
http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/amtterm.git;a=summary
Michael, you are welcome to join as well if you are interested!
>> "Paul Wise" <pabs@debian.org> writes on 31.10.2007:
>>> Quick review of the diff:
>>> Might want to use quilt for the patches
> I've sticked to dpatch.
Since I'm very much used to quilt and have a dislike for dpatch, would
you mind if I changed that to quilt before uploading?
>> It seems that you did not react to Paul's suggestions to improve the
>> package. Moreover it seems that you have not updated to package since
>> that 27 Oct 2007.
>
> As I mentioned, I wasn't aware of it. That's now fixed.
In future, please make sure that you CC your ITP bug when asking for a
sponsor of a new package. That's how I found your packaging work.
>> [1] http://git.zerfleddert.de/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi/amt
>
> Did he get in touch with upstream, to get those patches merged ?
Michael? Can you please clarify?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
Reply to: